Interreligious Environmental Ethics: A Comparative Philosophical Analysis of Religious Teachings and Ecological Responsibility

Authors

  • Mahfud Heru Fatoni Institut Islam Mambaul Ulum Surakarta
  • Muhamad Hanif Fuadi Institut Nahdlatul Ulama Tasikmalaya
  • Adhe Ismail Ananda Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Mamdukh Budiman Universiti Muhammadiyah Malaysia Perlis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70062/greenphilosophy.v1i3.256

Keywords:

Ecological Responsibility, Environmental Stewardship, Interfaith Dialogue, Interreligious Ethics, Religious Teachings

Abstract

This study explores the role of interreligious environmental ethics in shaping global cooperation to address the ongoing ecological crisis. By analyzing and comparing the teachings of Islam, Christianity, Hinduism, and Buddhism, the study identifies key environmental ethics principles that are shared across these religious traditions, such as non-violence, the sacredness of nature, and the principle of moderation in resource use. Despite theological and doctrinal differences, these shared values provide a strong philosophical and moral foundation for fostering cooperation among religious communities in addressing global environmental challenges. The study also examines the philosophical divergences within religious teachings, such as the varying interpretations of human dominion over nature and the role of humans as stewards or caretakers of the Earth. These theological differences present challenges in creating a unified environmental ethical framework, yet they also highlight the richness and diversity of religious perspectives on ecological responsibility. The practical applications of these teachings are discussed, focusing on how religious values have been integrated into real-world environmental movements, such as faith-based environmentalism and interfaith collaborations. The findings underscore the potential for interfaith dialogue to catalyze global environmental action and the creation of a unified global ethical system. Such a system, grounded in shared religious values, could provide a framework for sustainable practices and ecological justice, offering a moral guide for individuals, communities, and nations in their efforts to mitigate environmental degradation and promote sustainability.

References

Abe, H., Fritsch, M., & Wenning, M. (2022). Environmental philosophy and East Asia: Nature, time, responsibility. In Environmental Philosophy and East Asia: Nature, Time, Responsibility. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003217305

Artemyeva, O. V. (2021). Virtue and duty in Thomas Reid’s moral philosophy. Ethical Thought, 21(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-4870-2021-21-1-106-121

Berkes, F. (2024). Biodiversity, religion traditions. In Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Third Edition: Volume 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822562-2.00011-6

Collins, M., Hughes, W., & Samuels, A. (2018). The politics of transformation in the global crisis. In Vital Signs: Psychological Responses to Ecological Crisis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429484728-22

de Groot, W. T., & Knippenberg, L. (2023). A virtue ethic for the Earth. Journal of Ecohumanism, 2(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.33182/joe.v2i2.2835

Gudynas, E. (2017). Deep ecologies in the highlands and rainforests: Finding Naess in the neotropics. Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 21(3), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685357-02103005

Helfaya, A., Kotb, A., & Hanafi, R. (2018). Qur’anic ethics for environmental responsibility: Implications for business practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1105–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3195-6

Imran, M. H. (2024). Religious philosophies and environmental ethics. In Religious Philosophies and Environmental Ethics. https://doi.org/10.2174/97898152748201240101

Karamehmedović, D. (2024). Tourism: A bridge between religions. International Journal of Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage, 12(2), 1–12. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85213270822&partnerID=40&md5=9e2be068b5d6541e35b8251f5a33385f

Kennel, C., El-Beltagy, A. S., & Falk, J. (2024). Navigation through uncertainties: Part A: Regional action on climate change. In Climate Change and Sustainable Agro-ecology in Global Drylands. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781800624870.0002

Khazaie, G. R., Riazi, S. A., & Azadarmaki, T. (2020). Religious ecologism, a comparative review of Abrahamian, East Asian, and Ancient Iranian religious traditions. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 28(1), 425–440. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85082057714&partnerID=40&md5=ed6330834104652b3185ddf5b50208c8

Kortetmäki, T. (2016). Is broad the new deep in environmental ethics? A comparison of broad ecological justice and deep ecology. Ethics and the Environment, 21(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.2979/ethicsenviro.21.1.04

Lawson, J., Miller, K., & Wescott, G. (2015). Reshaping the worldview: Case studies of faith groups’ approaches to a new Australian land ethic. In The Changing World Religion Map: Sacred Places, Identities, Practices and Politics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_14

Mathews, F. (2017). Relating to nature: Deep ecology or ecofeminism? In Feminist Ecologies: Changing Environments in the Anthropocene. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64385-4_3

Melnik, S. (2021). Periodization of the history of interreligious dialogue at the modern stage. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo Gumanitarnogo Universiteta, Seria I. Bogoslovie, Filosofia, Religiovedenie, 96, 95–118. https://doi.org/10.15382/STURI202196.95-118

Mizzoni, J. (2014). Environmental ethics: A Catholic view. Environmental Ethics, 36(4), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics201436445

Mufid, A., Massoweang, A. K., Mujizatullah, M., & Muslim, A. (2023). A religious discourse on water and environmental conservation issues: An interfaith approach. Verbum et Ecclesia, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v44i1.2822

Pedersen, K. P. (2018). Environmental ethics in interreligious perspective. In Explorations in Global Ethics: Comparative Religious Ethics and Interreligious Dialogue. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429500626

Rots, A. P. (2015). Sacred forests, sacred nation: The Shinto environmentalist paradigm and the rediscovery of Chinju no Mori. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 42(2), 205–233. https://doi.org/10.18874/jjrs.42.2.2015.205-233

Sachdeva, S. (2017). The influence of sacred beliefs in environmental risk perception and attitudes. Environment and Behavior, 49(5), 583–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516649413

Sayem, M. A. (2021). Religions and environmental sustainability: Focusing on some practical approaches by John B. Cobb Jr. and Seyyed Hossein Nasr. Australian Journal of Islamic Studies, 6(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v6i1.265

Smith, W. (2019). The role of environment clubs in promoting ecocentrism in secondary schools: Student identity and relationship to the earth. Journal of Environmental Education, 50(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2018.1499603

Štante, N. F. (2024). Women’s environmental peacebuilding—from the lens of post-colonial theological ecofeminism. Poligrafi, 29(113–114), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.35469/poligrafi.2024.451

Tariq, A., & Tanveer, Y. (2024). Sacred choices: Exploring the influence of religion on green consumption. In Government Influences on Eco-Friendly Practices in Business. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6265-5.ch008

Walker, P., & Lovat, T. (2017). Traditional approaches to ethical decision making. SpringerBriefs in Ethics, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4301-7_2

Downloads

Published

2024-07-30

How to Cite

Mahfud Heru Fatoni, Muhamad Hanif Fuadi, Adhe Ismail Ananda, & Mamdukh Budiman. (2024). Interreligious Environmental Ethics: A Comparative Philosophical Analysis of Religious Teachings and Ecological Responsibility. Green Philosophy: International Journal of Religious Education and Philosophy, 1(3), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.70062/greenphilosophy.v1i3.256

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.