Constructing a Theological-Philosophical Framework for Climate Justice: The Role of Religious Education in Empowering Eco-ethical Action
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70062/greenphilosophy.v1i3.257Keywords:
Climate justice, Religious education, Ethical philosophy, Moral responsibility, Environmental stewardshipAbstract
This study proposes an integrative framework for climate justice that combines moral theology, ethical philosophy, and religious pedagogy to encourage active participation in eco-ethical actions. The framework addresses the growing need for religious communities to engage in environmental stewardship by merging traditional religious teachings with contemporary environmental ethics. The research emphasizes the importance of eco-ethical education within religious settings, which fosters a deep sense of moral responsibility toward environmental care. Data for the study was gathered through field observations and interviews with religious educators and environmental activists, aiming to understand current educational practices and to explore opportunities for integrating climate justice into religious curricula. The study found that, while there are challenges such as curriculum limitations, ideological resistance, and insufficient understanding of climate justice, the proposed framework offers a powerful tool for religious institutions to foster environmentally responsible and ethically committed individuals. It also highlights the potential for collaboration between religious organizations and environmental groups to further promote climate justice. The study concludes that religious education has a unique role in shaping individuals' attitudes towards environmental issues, offering a distinct advantage over secular approaches by embedding moral responsibility into faith-based practices. Further research is recommended to explore the integration of climate justice in religious education and its impact on community behavior and sustainability.
References
Benatar, S. (2018). Global Bioethics and Global Education. Advancing Global Bioethics, 10, 23 – 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78984-2_2
Bourban, M. (2023). Climate Ethics. In Handbook of the Anthropocene: Humans between Heritage and Future. https://doi.org/10.1007/9783031259104_87
Brincat, S. (2015). Global climate change justice: From Rawls’ law of peoples to Honneth’s conditions of freedom. Environmental Ethics, 37(3), 277 – 305. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics201537329
Cîrceie, V.-O., & Cîrceie, E.-S. (2021). The Religious Education in the light of interstatal Orthodox Churches Relations; [Educaţia religioasa în lumina relaţiilor bisericeşti ortodoxe interstatale]. Astra Salvensis, 2, 97 – 109. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85124961832&partnerID=40&md5=d8ad44d1d7ccbd750b48751050375aa5
Cousineau, M. (2023). Liberation Theology in Latin America. In The Routledge International Handbook of Sociology and Christianity. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003277743-33
Eaude, T. (2023). Spiritual and moral development. In Debates in Religious Education: Second edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003406280-11
El-Sherbiny, Y. S., Hammad, H., & El-Bassiouny, N. (2024). Ethics Education, Moral Attentiveness and Consumer Wisdom: Exploring the Relationships. Journal of Macromarketing, 44(4), 798 – 812. https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467241286255
Gašpar, A., & Garmaz, J. (2016). The corpus-based study on the impact of religious education on the humanization of man and development of religious competence; [Korpusno utemeljeno proučevanje učinka verske vzgoje na humanizacijo človeka in razvoj verske kompetence]. Bogoslovni Vestnik, 76(2), 417 – 431. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84992123343&partnerID=40&md5=e083e0c1aa785383fd6592eaeae5c5db
Gocko, J. (2024). Ecology and Justice: From Environmental Justice to Integral Ecology of «Laudato si’»; [Ekologia a sprawiedliwość. Od Environmental Justice do ekologii integralnej «Laudato si’»]. Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae, 22(1), 75 – 82. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5799
Joshi, S. (2023). Climate Justice: Taking Back the Commons. In Climate, Science and Society: A Primer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003409748-20
Leal, A., & Durante, D. (2021). Responsibility principle in Hans Jonas as a proposal of ethics for a sustainable society; [O princípio responsabilidade em Hans Jonas como proposta de ética para uma sociedade sustentável]. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 58, 82 – 104. https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v58i0.71625
Lusk, M., & Corbett, D. (2021). Liberation theology and international social work. Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Social Work, 40(1), 92 – 107. https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2020.1848750
Maboloc, C. R. (2016). On the Ethical and Democratic Deficits of Environmental Pragmatism. Journal of Human Values, 22(2), 107 – 114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971685815627930
Marcos, A., & Valera, L. (2022). From environmental ethics to human ecology. A necessary change; [DE LA ÉTICA AMBIENTAL A LA ECOLOGÍA HUMANA. UN CAMBIO NECESARIO]. Pensamiento, 78(298), 785 – 800. https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v78.i298.y2022.027
Misra, R., & Goel, P. (2021). Examining effectiveness of teaching business ethics: An experimental assessment. Journal of Education for Business, 96(3), 135 – 142. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2020.1777521
Okereke, C. (2018). The Ethical Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. In The Politics of the Environment: A Survey. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315728278-9
Pop, A. I., & Pop, M. O. (2017). The development of religious fillings for pre-schoolers; [Dezvoltarea religiozitǎţII la preşcolari]. Astra Salvensis, 5(9), 89 – 100. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85032285229&partnerID=40&md5=62c48bf4f0f9c2bb0350332c68f7c6ef
Shah, S. S., & Asghar, Z. (2024). Individual attitudes towards environmentally friendly choices: a comprehensive analysis of the role of legal rules, religion, and confidence in government. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 14(4), 629 – 651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-024-00913-5
Téllez, A. R. R., Toro, C. M., & Domínguez, F. C. T. (2023). Finding Common Ground: Humanity’s Relationship with Nature. A Comparison of Thomas Aquinas and Environmental Ethics; [Znalezienie wspólnego gruntu. Relacja czlowieka z natura. Studium porównawcze mysli sw. Tomasza z Akwinu i etyki srodowiskowej]; [Encontrando un terreno común: La relación de la humanidad con la naturaleza: una comparación de Tomás de Aquino y la ética ambiental]. Biblica et Patristica Thoruniensia, 16(2), 205 – 220. https://doi.org/10.12775/BPTh.2023.011
Vaidyanathan, B., Khalsa, S., & Ecklund, E. H. (2018). Naturally Ambivalent: Religion’s Role in Shaping Environmental Action. Sociology of Religion: A Quarterly Review, 79(4), 472 – 494. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srx043
Wallimann-Helmer, I. (2018). Justice in managing global climate change. In Managing Global Warming: An Interface of Technology and Human Issues. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814104-5.00026-0
Wiktor-Mach, D., & Pędziwiatr, K. (2024). Polish Catholic environmentalism as the counterculture movement. Environmental Politics, 33(6), 976 – 996. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2024.2313656
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Green Philosophy: International Journal of Religious Education and Philosophy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

