Transnational Islamic Bioethics: A Comparative Study of Sharia-Based Approaches to Genetic Editing and Global Medical Ethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70062/harmonyphilosophy.v1i2.276Keywords:
Genetic Editing, Global Medical Ethics, Human Procreation, Islamic Bioethics, Sharia LawAbstract
This study explores the ethical perspectives of genetic editing from two distinct frameworks: Islamic bioethics and global medical ethics. Both ethical systems emphasize the protection of human dignity and the prevention of harm, aligning with the broader goal of promoting health. However, significant differences emerge when addressing the issue of genetic editing, particularly in relation to human procreation. While global bioethics focuses on universal human rights, Islamic bioethics introduces religious principles rooted in Sharia law, such as Maqasid al-Sharia (objectives of Sharia) and Maslahah (public interest), to guide the ethical evaluation of genetic technologies. The findings reveal that while both frameworks agree on the importance of medical necessity, the treatment-enhancement distinction plays a critical role in Islamic perspectives, leading to more cautious stances on genetic modifications aimed at enhancing non-medical traits. The study also underscores the cultural and regional variations in Islamic bioethics, reflecting how different Islamic schools of thought impact fatwa decisions on genetic editing. In comparison, global bioethics aims to establish universal principles, often focusing on human rights, equality, and equity. The paper concludes by recommending more inclusive discussions between Islamic scholars and global bioethicists to bridge the gap between religious ethics and global standards. This would help ensure that genetic technologies are applied ethically, respecting both cultural values and universal human rights, and addressing the challenges posed by emerging genetic technologies.
References
Al-Balas, Q. A. E., Dajani, R., & Al-Delaimy, W. K. (2020). The ethics of gene editing from an Islamic perspective: A focus on the recent gene editing of the Chinese twins. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(3), 1851–1860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00205-5
Al-Delaimy, A. K. (2022). Perspective of ethical issues and challenges of biotechnology in developing country. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine, 22(1), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.37268/MJPHM/VOL.22/NO.1/ART.1449
Alsomali, N., & Hussein, G. (2021). CRISPR-Cas9 and He Jiankui’s case: An Islamic bioethics review using maqāṣid al-sharīʿa and qawāʿid fiqhiyyah. Asian Bioethics Review, 13(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-021-00167-1
Baharuddin, A., Musa, M. N., & Salleh, S. M. S. S. M. (2016). A preliminary insight into an Islamic mechanism for neuroethics. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 23(1), 1–3.
Bu, Q. (2019). Reassess the law and ethics of heritable genome editing interventions: Lessons for China and the world. Issues in Law and Medicine, 34(2), 115–145.
Chan, S., & Medina Arellano, M. (2016). Genome editing and international regulatory challenges: Lessons from Mexico. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 2(3), 426–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2016.05.001
Chin, A. H. B., Al-Balas, Q., Ahmad, M. F., Alsomali, N., & Ghaly, M. (2024). Islamic perspectives on polygenic testing and selection of IVF embryos (PGT-P) for optimal intelligence and other non–disease-related socially desirable traits. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 21(3), 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-023-10293-0
Chin, A. H. B., Muhsin, S. M., & Ahmad, M. F. (2023). Islamic perspectives on elective ovarian tissue freezing by single women for non-medical or social reasons. Asian Bioethics Review, 15(3), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-022-00236-z
Dayan, F. (2019). CRISPR Cas-9 genome editing and Islam: A religious perspective. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science, 18(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v18i1.39540
Hanna, S., Aji, A. M., Tholabi, A., & Amin, M. (2024). Woman and fatwa: An analytical study of MUI’s fatwa on women’s health and beauty. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v24i1.37832
Ibrahim, A. H., Rahman, N. N. A., Saifuddeen, S. M., & Baharuddin, M. (2019). Maqāṣid al-sharīʿah based Islamic bioethics: A comprehensive approach. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 16(3), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-019-09902-8
Inhorn, M. C., & Tremayne, S. (2016). Islam, assisted reproduction, and the bioethical aftermath. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(2), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0151-1
Inhorn, M. C., & Tremayne, S. (2024). Islam, assisted reproduction, and the bioethical aftermath. In Cultural responsiveness in assisted reproductive technology: Best practices for clinics and affiliated providers. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76204-8_12
Javadli, G. (2024). Islamic bioethics and modern globalization values: Main points of contact. Trans/Form/Acao, 47(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2024.v47.n3.e0240087
Kamar, I. M. (2021). The concept of maṣlaḥah according to Wahbah al-Zuḥaylī (1932–2015): An assessment. Jurnal Fiqh, 18(1), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.22452/fiqh.vol18no1.7
Ladas, I. (2024). Interreligious bioethics: Challenges and perspectives. Journal of Philosophy ARHE, 21(42), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2024.42.203-220
Lala, I. (2020). Germ-inating solutions or gene-rating problems: An Islamic perspective on human germline gene editing. Journal of Religion and Health, 59(4), 1855–1869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-019-00770-5
Minchenko, T. P., & Gribkov, E. (2024). The problems of human embryos genome editing from the position of Islam denominations. Conatus: Journal of Philosophy, 9(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.31514
Nie, J.-B. (2020). Human genome editing and a global socio-bioethics approach. The Hastings Center Report, 50(6), 44–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1200
Padela, A. I. (2019). Using the maqāṣid al-sharīʿah to furnish an Islamic bioethics: Conceptual and practical issues. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 16(3), 347–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-019-09940-2
Ranisch, R., Rudolph, T., Cremer, H.-J., & Knoepffler, N. (2020). Ordo-responsibility for germline gene editing. The CRISPR Journal, 3(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2019.0040
Serour, G. I., & Serour, A. G. I. (2019). The Islamic perspective: Application of advanced reproductive technologies to screen human embryos during IVF. In Human embryos and preimplantation genetic technologies: Ethical, social, and public policy aspects. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816468-6.00010-2
Shabana, A. (2022). Between treatment and enhancement: Islamic discourses on the boundaries of human genetic modification. Journal of Religious Ethics, 50(3), 386–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12404
Sharaf-Eldin, W. (2024). Technologies of gene editing and related clinical trials for the treatment of genetic and acquired diseases: A systematic review. Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43042-024-00501-w
Singh, B., Kaunert, C., Jermsittiparsert, K., Sharma, B., & Raghav, A. (2024). Analyzing human genome and embryo editing: International canons for legal-social issues concerning women’s health and reproductive rights. In Intersections of law and computational intelligence in health governance. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-5976-1.ch003
Suleman, M. (2017). Biomedical research ethics in the Islamic context: Reflections on and challenges for Islamic bioethics. In Islamic bioethics: Current issues and challenges. World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781783267507_0010
ten Have, H. (2016). Encyclopedia of global bioethics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0
Ten Have, H. A. M. J., & Gordijn, B. (2014). Structure of the compendium. In Handbook of global bioethics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2512-6_65
Xue, Y., & Shang, L. (2022). Governance of heritable human gene editing worldwide and beyond. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116739
