Re-evaluating Fiqh Methodology: Toward a Contextual Islamic Legal Framework Responsive to Global Social Transformations

Authors

  • Prasetyo Hartanto Telkom University
  • Ansor Lubis Universitas Medan Area

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70062/harmonyphilosophy.v1i4.328

Keywords:

Contextual Fiqh, Digital Economy, Islamic Law, Migration Patterns, Social Norms

Abstract

This study explores the re-evaluation and re-shaping of fiqh methodology to ensure Islamic law remains relevant and responsive to contemporary issues. As society evolves, new challenges such as migration, the digital economy, and shifting moral standards present complex legal and ethical dilemmas that traditional fiqh struggles to address. Contextual fiqh, which integrates classical Islamic principles with modern social, economic, and technological developments, offers a dynamic approach to Islamic law that addresses these challenges. The study emphasizes the flexibility of contextual fiqh in offering more adaptable legal solutions, particularly in the realms of migration, digital transactions, and family law. By incorporating modern social dynamics, including technological advancements like cryptocurrencies and virtual marriages, contextual fiqh proposes a legal framework that is both grounded in Islamic principles and relevant to contemporary needs. The research highlights the importance of interdisciplinary engagement between Islamic scholarship and fields such as economics, sociology, and technology, offering a holistic approach to legal decision-making. Through the examination of case studies, such as the application of Islamic legal principles to global migration patterns and digital financial systems, the study demonstrates how contextual fiqh can provide ethical and practical solutions to modern problems. The findings suggest that the adoption of contextual fiqh can lead to more inclusive, just, and responsive legal frameworks, making Islamic law more adaptable and effective in addressing the complexities of the modern world.

References

Adil, M., & Harun, M. (2018). Fiqh Melayu Nusantara in the Palembang Darussalam Sultanate Period. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 18(2), 347 – 374. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v18i2.9649

Akbar, A. O. (2014). Epistemological Construction of Imam Syâfi’î Legal Reasoning; [KONSTRUKSI EPISTEMOLOGIS PENALARAN HUKUM IMAM SYÂFI’Î]. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 14(2), 185 – 192. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v14i2.1277

Akram, M. (2019). Issues of Muslim Minorities in Non-Muslim Societies: An Appraisal of Classical and Modern Islamic Legal Discourses with Reference to Fiqh al-Aqalliyyāt. Islamic Studies, 58(1), 107 – 125. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85150358405&partnerID=40&md5=6f7c91ad9fa7573bbe5dca6e3bfd331b

Ali, S. S., & Yousaf, F. A. (2018). Islamic Law, Social Justice and Injustices: The Case for Islamic Welfare Systems. In Beyond Law and Development: Resistance, Empowerment and Social Injustice. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203745298-14

Dalmızrak, Y. (2023). The Development of Mabādī Subjects in the Classical Books on Uşūl al-Fiqh; [Klasik Fıkıh Usûlü Eserlerinde Mebâdî Konularının Gelişimi]. Islam Tetkikleri Dergisi, 13(1), 142 – 173. https://doi.org/10.26650/iuitd.2023.1193988

Dedi, S. (2020). Ushul Fiqih Menurut Paradigma Filsafat Ilmu (Kajian Ontologi, Epistemologi, dan Aksiologi). Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 5(2), 289 – 310. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v5i2.1829

Fakihudin, R. (2023). Formulation of public policy based on islamic legal studies as a solution in the contemporary era. Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society, 2(2), 145 – 166. https://doi.org/10.15294/ciils.v2i2.68868

Fanani, M., & Pohl, F. (2024). FIQH-BASED SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION IN FARMER EMPOWERMENT A Participatory Action Research Approach. Al-Jami’ah, 62(2), 305 – 335. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2024.622.305-335

Fikri, M., Abbas, Muchtar, M. I., Darlius, & Al-Amin, D. (2024). Emergence of Digital Matrimony: Exploring Islamic Legal Responses to Metaverse Marriages. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 14(2), 246 – 262. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.142.15

Huda, Y., Burhanuddin, J., & Kooria, M. (2023). Strengthening the Shafi‘i Madhhab: Malay Kitab Jawi of Fiqh in the 19th Century. Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah, 22(2), 259 – 273. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v22i2.10282

Karimullah, S. S. (2023). FROM TRADITION TO MAINSTREAM: UNDERSTANDING THE INTEGRATION OF ISLAMIC LAW IN VARIOUS GLOBAL SETTINGS. Justicia Islamica, 20(2), 215 – 240. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v20i2.6478

Mohammed, M. O., Amri, M. C. El, & Bakr, A. M. (2024). Guiding Fiqh Analysis of Crypto Assets: A Proposed Framework. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 24(2), 276 – 295. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v24i2.37346

Pauzi, M., Hipni, D., & Radiamoda, A. M. (2023). THE IMPORTANCE OF THE IJTIHAD JAMA’I METHOD IN CONTEMPORARY FIQH FORMULATIONS. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 23(1), 13 – 20. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v23i1.1322

Rosyid, M., Kholiq, A. N., Bintarawati, F., Rofiq, M. K., Lutfi, L., & Irfan, M. N. (2024). Revitalization of uṣūl al-fiqh through iḥtiyāṭī principles. In Religion, Education, Science and Technology towards a More Inclusive and Sustainable Future: Proceedings of the 5th International Colloquium on Interdisciplinary Islamic Studies (ICIIS 2022), Lombok, Indonesia, 19-20 October 2022. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003322054-6

Soufi, Y. L. (2021). “Why study usūl al-fiqh?”: The problem of Taqlīd and tough cases in 4th-5th /10th-11th century iraq. Islamic Law and Society, 28(1–2), 1 – 31. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-BJA10006

Wathani, S., Ismail, H., & Abdillah, A. M. (2022). Reconstruction of Women’s Fiqh: An Analysis of Muhammad Shahrūr’s Contemporary Reading in a Hermeneutic Perspective; [Rekonstruksi Fikih Perempuan: Analisis Pembacaan Kontemporer Muhammad Shahrūr Perspektif Hermenuetik]. Journal of Islamic Law, 3(2), 159 – 175. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v3i2.860

Zaini Yahaya, M., Adib Samsudin, M., & Lalulddin, H. (2014). An overview of the principles of jurisprudence Vis-A-Vis legal maxim. Asian Social Science, 10(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n2p157

Downloads

Published

2024-11-30

How to Cite

Prasetyo Hartanto, & Ansor Lubis. (2024). Re-evaluating Fiqh Methodology: Toward a Contextual Islamic Legal Framework Responsive to Global Social Transformations. Harmony Philosophy: International Journal of Islamic Religious Studies and Sharia, 1(4), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.70062/harmonyphilosophy.v1i4.328

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.