Eco-Hermeneutics and Scriptural Interpretation: Reimagining Sacred Texts for an Environmental Theology of Care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70062/greenphilosophy.v2i1.254Keywords:
Eco-Hermeneutics, Ecological Responsibility, Sacred Texts, Religious Communities, Environmental EthicsAbstract
This study explores the application of eco-hermeneutics, an interdisciplinary approach combining ecological thought and scriptural interpretation, to sacred texts such as the Bible, Quran, and Vedas. Eco-hermeneutics seeks to reinterpret traditional religious teachings to emphasize ecological responsibility, interconnectedness, and the moral obligation of humans to protect the environment. The analysis identifies key ecological themes within sacred scriptures, including creation care, stewardship, and the intrinsic value of nature. Interviews with theologians and environmental ethicists provide practical insights into how eco-hermeneutical interpretations can be applied in contemporary religious contexts, offering a fresh perspective on environmental ethics rooted in religious teachings. This approach challenges anthropocentric views, which have historically positioned humans as dominators of nature, and instead advocates for an ecocentric understanding of the environment. The findings highlight the potential of eco-hermeneutics to inspire faith-based responses to the ecological crises, urging religious communities to adopt these interpretations to foster environmental stewardship. However, challenges and resistance from traditional religious communities are identified, particularly concerning entrenched views on human supremacy over nature. The study also explores the implications of eco-hermeneutics for religious education, suggesting that its integration into religious curricula could promote a theology of care and responsibility toward the environment. The paper concludes by calling for further research on the practical applications of eco-hermeneutics, particularly in how these teachings can be incorporated into religious practices and community actions, contributing to global sustainability efforts.
References
Ayres, J. R. (2017). Cultivating the “unquiet heart”: Ecology, education, and Christian faith. Theology Today, 74(1), 57 – 65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040573616689836
Bali, K. (2021). On the Issue of “Green Theology”: A Spiritual Turn toward Creation through the Mysticism of Dorothee Sölle; [K problematice „Green theology“ Spirituální obrat ke stvoření skrze mystiku Dorothee Sölle]. Studia Theologica, 23(3), 135 – 147. https://doi.org/10.5507/sth.2021.026
Barbosa-Fohrmann, A. P., da Silva, C. A. P., & Escobar, C. V. do A. (2016). Ecological ethics: Reflections on human action on nature; [ética ambiental: Reflexões acerca da ação humana sobre a natureza]. Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermeneutica e Teoria Do Direito, 8(3), 366 – 374. https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2016.83.09
Basart, J. M. (2021). Environmental ethics: When human beings and nature are not two. In Multidisciplinary Approaches to Ethics in the Digital Era. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4117-3.ch002
Birkler, M. K. (2023). Indecent eco-theology: A case for practice-oriented eco-theology. Dialog, 62(4), 309 – 316. https://doi.org/10.1111/dial.12832
Bol, J. W., Johnson, P. C., & Childs, J. M. (2023). Environmental Ethics and Corporate Decision Making for Sustainable Performance. In Sustainability Perspectives for Resources and Business. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780138737689-6
Chapman, A. R. (2019). The greening of science, theology, and ethics. In Science and Theology: The New Consonance. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429497421-17
Cohen, M. Z., & Berlin, A. (2016). Interpreting scriptures in judaism, Christianity and islam: Overlapping inquiries. In Interpreting Scriptures in Judaism, Christianity and Islam: Overlapping Inquiries. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107588554
Copeland, R. L. (2021). Ecomimetic interpretation: Ascertainment, identification, and dialogue in Matthew 6:25-34. Biblical Interpretation, 29(1), 67 – 89. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685152-00284P07
Gareiou, Z., & Zervas, E. (2018). Analysis of environmental references in the texts of the four gospels using descriptive statistics. Religions, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9090266
Ibita, M. M. S. (2020). The Great Flood in Genesis 6–9: An Ecological Reading of the J and P Traditions. Biblical Theology Bulletin, 50(2), 68 – 76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146107920913791
Imran, M. H. (2024). Solution for the future. In Religious Philosophies and Environmental Ethics. https://doi.org/10.2174/9789815274820124010007
Kiem, Y. (2024). How to Engage with Non-Human Others in Ecosystems from a Phenomenological and Interreligious Perspective. Religions, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15121539
Krohling, A., & Silva, T. M. (2019). A new ethical conception sustainability through deep ecology principles; [Um repensar ético sobre a sustentabilidade à luz da ecologia profunda]. Revista Eletronica Direito e Sociedade, 7(1), 45 – 60. https://doi.org/10.18316/redes.v7i1.4301
Leese, J. J. J. (2019). Ecofaith: Reading scripture in an era of ecological crisis. Religions, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10030154
Lenart, B. A. (2020). A wholesome anthropocentrism: Reconceptualizing the value of nature within the framework of an enlightened self-interest. Ethics and the Environment, 25(2), 97 – 177. https://doi.org/10.2979/ethicsenviro.25.2.05
Liang, H. (2019). Dialogical hermeneutics: The methodological exploration of Chinese biblical studies from the perspective of comparative scriptural studies. Logos and Pneuma - Chinese Journal of Theology, 2019-Spring(50), 33 – 68. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85063391285&partnerID=40&md5=023e59c20d5e73c19290789d12858a67
Medhananda, S. (2021). Why sri aurobindo’s hermeneutics still matters: Philology and the transformative possibilities of scripture. Religions, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12070484
Oeming, M. (2017). Contemporary Biblical Hermeneutics: An Introduction. In Contemporary Biblical Hermeneutics: An Introduction. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315259499
Olausson, U. (2024). Deep Sustainability as Care: A Nondual Approach to Environmental Communication. Environmental Communication, 18(1–2), 178 – 183. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2023.2296842
Richie, T. (2014). Radical and responsible: A Wesleyan-Pentecostal ecotheology. Journal of Pentecostal Theology, 23(2), 216 – 235. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455251-02301005
Sarkar, S. (2014). Environmental philosophy: From theory to practice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 45(1), 89 – 891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.10.010
Tatay, J. (2024). The Evolution of Catholic Ecological Hermeneutics. Theological Studies, 85(3), 379 – 399. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405639241263277
Woolf, K. M. (2019). Hybrid Hierophanies: Where Rastafari Meets Religious Ecology in Kei Miller’s The Cartographer Tries to Map a Way to Zion. Journal of Foreign Languages and Cultures, 3(1), 91 – 102. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85169075763&partnerID=40&md5=2f28d8e954dc9870e26f5eee32484a42
Zhou, J. (2024). Ecophilosophy and the ethics of alpine grassland sustainability. In Grassland Degradation, Restoration, and Sustainable Management of Global Alpine Areas. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-21882-8.00025-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Green Philosophy: International Journal of Religious Education and Philosophy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
